Science Policy UK: BBSRC Delivery Plan 2011-15
BBSRC have just published their 2011-15 delivery plan.
BBSRC have just published their 2011-15 delivery plan.
Interesting article on InsideHigherEd on the development of bibliometrics to accommodate social media use in science. One particularly interesting aspect is the commercial considerations and how these interact with the academic. /...
.../ Clearly publishers will be interested in how metrics affect their commercial interests, as will libraries and academic institutions. Bibliometrics are transparently about the behaviour of groups of academics with respect to particular publication media - but the non-academic parameters are less frequently appreciated.
The National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement - a focus for higher education public engagement - has just released a manifesto for public engagement for UK universities. Will be interesting to see how this gathers momentum - particularly also /...
.../ with the recent launch of the new concordat from UK research funders, and looking forward to the development of Science and Society initiatives from the UK Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS).
John Holdren, Director of the US White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, has issued a memo on scientific integrity in government. This follows the earlier 2009 memo from the US President. /...
.../
Strong emphasis on the responsibility of the resposibility and accoutability of agencies for the integrity of science and scientific decsion-making. A different emphasis from the UK GOS principles of scientific advice and Guidelines for the use of science and engineering advice in Government released in June 2010.
Very interesting site from Sciencewise ERC on public engagement and citizen science relating to environment and landscapes - Public engagement on landscape & ecosystem futures in England, Scotland and Wales /...
.../
This is from the ScienceWise Expert Resource Centre (a UK government initiative for dialogue on science in society). Of particular interest is that this focuses on citizen science in the sense of a direct engagement of the public in decisions and interpretation of science in a policy framework - in contrast to the use of citizen science to mean public participation in field monitoring and so forth. This particular initiative also connects to the UK National Ecosystem Assessment which will be released in the early part of 2011.
The Annual Report and Accounts of the Natural Environment Research Council are just available online.
A new plant science networking website has been launched for the UK.
Good article by Ahmed Zawail aimed at both developed and developing countries in Nature, reminding us of the essential importance of fundamental research to good science. Ahmed Zewail Curiouser and curiouser: managing discovery making. Nature 468, 347 (2010) doi:10.1038/468347a /....
.../
To quote:
"First, and most important, are the people involved. Giving proper priority to providing thorough and inspiring education in science, technology, mathematics and engineering is essential. Research and development needs to attract the best young minds. Large buildings and massive funds will not produce much without the right people.
Second, an atmosphere of intellectual exchange is of paramount importance for ideas to crystallize. To distract faculty members with the writing of extensive and numerous proposals or to turn them into managers is the beginning of the end. The modern enterprise of science has become so bloated and complex that the traditional models of funding must be re-examined. How do we focus resources on the best science and what is the level of funding needed to serve society best?
Third, without resources little can be achieved, no matter how creative the mind. Obviously, investment in science is needed to build instruments and to hire competent staff. Countries and institutions that provide the requisite infrastructure and the funding for ideas will be the homes of discoveries. But such support should follow the vision of creative researchers, not be built merely to lure money or to force people into fashionable research areas such as nanotechnology."
Interesting Nature news blog post yesterday on science policy discussions in the US on rare earth metals and their availabilty. This has been a fairly regular topic in the last five years with concerns on where the metals are and how markets operate.
In the US, there have been reports such as the 2008 Minerals, Critical Minerals, and the U.S. Economy from the National Research Council, aimed at Congress. Richard H has pointed to European developments: the EU Raw Materials Initiative resulted in the publication of Critical Raw Materials in June 2010, the report and an annex of an Ad Hoc Task Force on Defining Critical Raw Materials. I believe that a Communication from the Commission is due on this in January - although it has leaked a little to the press.
In the UK, there is a current inquiry of the House of Commons Committee on Science and Technology on Strategically Important Metals, which is asking questions about the UK position - written evidence due by 17 December 2010.
The lists of metals in the different reports shift slightly, owing to methodologies for assessment and the economic or strategic interests defined. Politically, there is increasing noise about working with China - such as from a conference last week in Germany that was reported in Der Spigel. The German government raised this in mid October with the release of a national strategy and there have been exchanges since, with proposals for G8 and G20 discussions.