Biodiversity UK: DfID invitation to tender for REDD+ study
The UK Department for International Development, DFID, has called for proposals for a scoping study of UK potential and options with respect to REDD+
The UK Department for International Development, DFID, has called for proposals for a scoping study of UK potential and options with respect to REDD+
The Council of Canadian Academies have published Canadian Taxonomy: Exploring Biodiversity, Creating Opportunity. Very interesting reading on science/biodiversity/taxonomy policy /.....
This report of the Expert Panel on Biodiversity Science provides an excellent view of the importance of biodiversity; the consequent value and role of taxonomy; the Canadian situation in terms of research, collections and information; current gaps, and indications of future needs and development. It does not go as far as proposing priorities or actions, or strategic goals, but suggests that Canada could become an international leader in the field. It will be interesting to see how this is followed up and whether the UK/EU can develop a similarly crisp analysis.
The Atlas of Living Australia has been under development for some years, but was launched formally recently. It has a lot of familiar elements, but is interesting in bringing such a range of biodiversity information, links and tools together: collections, taxonomy, biological recording, citizen science, social media, news, events and more.
The Environmental Research Funders Forum (ERFF) merged a little while ago with the Living with Environmental Change (LWEC) network. A final product is a report on the skills needed for environmental management and policy which should be a useful reference for planning and advocacy to funders, thinking about training and HE, and consultancy planning - Most Wanted: Skills needs in the environment sector. Includes mention of taxonomy as an essential skill.
The Tenth Conference of the Parties (COP10) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has now finished. A useful summary is available with detail from IISD. /.....
.../
But in brief, the COP achieved its three high level objectives:
The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization was seen as being the crucial element of COP10, without which agreement on the Strategic Plan and other elements was at risk. Lots of very intense negotiations before and during COP10 resulted in agreement, but many of the parties clearly see this as less than ideal, and a significant step forward, rather than the desired state. There remain many different perspectives on some ABS issues.
However, the Protocol sets out a structured basis for access to genetic resources on the basis of prior informed consent and mutually agreed terms and aims to strike a balance of access with fair and equitable sharing of benefits. There was important inclusion of traditional knowledge as well. The detail on implementation will require a lot of work and commitment – both to ensure access and the realization of benefits. Entry into force is planned for 2012.
The Strategic Plan includes 20 headline targets under five strategic goals and its scope is biodiversity within the whole UN system. As it is framed, it looks hugely ambitious and will require an immense effort to reach success, given the difficulty in reaching the 2010 goals.
The Strategic Plan frames commitments for 2015 for:
and for 2020 for a range of other goals, including:
The resource mobilization strategy aims to ensure that finance will be in place to deliver the Strategic Plan – the idea is to define how this will work and set targets before COP11 in 2012. There was discussion, negotiation and some commitment from donors – the idea being that they should build biodiversity into their funding priorities for the future.
Other issues and agreements: decision effectively suspending geo-engineering; trying to persuade governments to use the precautionary principle on the release of synthetic life into the environment; affirmed the role of CBD in REDD+; adopted the Tkarihwaié:ri code of ethical conduct on "Respect for the Cultural and Intellectual Heritage ofIndigenous and Local Communities Relevant for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity"; and agreed increased cooperation among the Rio Conventions before the Rio+20 Summit in 2012. The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) was discussed and COP10 encouraged the UN General Assembly to consider establishing the mechanism. Quite a number of other issues of agreement, including uncontroversial support for the Global Taxonomy Initiative and a UN Decade on Biodiversity.
Buried well down in the Kew website, but worth a look at Perspectives on Biodiversity - good advocacy for Kew science, including external stakeholders such as CBD and PWC
HMG have put up a useful communication site on DirectGov - Nine days to Nagoya. Sounds like a film....
Strongly recommend having a look at the draft synthesis for the National Ecosystem Assessment, released yesterday, being led from WCMC for Defra..../ /...The emphasis is very much on ecosystem services, but takes a more detailed and developed approach than the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment for the national scale. Interesting views on trends and status, but also assessment of gaps and needs for development in understanding ecosystem services. What will also be interesting is how this might now contribute to the research direction of Defra and also of NERC/ESRC. I understand that the final report will be launched early 2011.
The European Envirionment Agency has issued a news highlight that makes a useful focus for EU positions, reports and trends, summarising the position in the lead into Nagoya.
Graham has pointed to the NSF Dimensions of Biodiversity campaign - 14 new grants looking at ecosystems with an interesting emphasis on micro elements - evolution, services and diversity.