Body:
The Interacademy Council has produced a review of IPCC that will be considered in Busan in October. Interesting to consider possible implications for the development of the possible Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) - if the General Assembly decide to proceed with this. Review is available from IAC and the Royal Society website. /...
.../
The first couple of recommendations focus on an executive committee and executive director. Then two recommendations on review mechanisms - again of interest for IPBES.
The next recommendations are of interest for communicating biodiversity science in a risk context for policy audiences:
- All Working Groups should use the
qualitative level-of-understanding scale in their Summary for Policy Makers and
Technical Summary, as suggested in IPCC’s uncertainty guidance for the Fourth
Assessment Report. This scale may be supplemented by a quantitative probability
scale, if appropriate. - Quantitative probabilities (as in the
likelihood scale) should be used to describe the probability of well-defined
outcomes only when there is sufficient evidence. Authors should indicate the
basis for assigning a probability to an outcome or event (e.g., based on
measurement, expert judgment, and/or model runs).
And a final recommendation on communications strategy.
Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
Add new comment