Science Policy: Bibliometrics and impact
Nature has published (17 October 2013) a special on Impact - methodologies, use and misuse, and implications.
Nature has published (17 October 2013) a special on Impact - methodologies, use and misuse, and implications.
An interesting post on Rod Page's iPhylo blog on possibilities for measuring collections impact through citation in publications. Refers also to correspondence in Nature from Kevin Winker and Jack Withrow and the methods used to construct a Google Scholar profile for the University of Alaska Bird collection.
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) was developed at the American Society for Cell Biology meeting in late 2012. It argues for the elimination of journal impact factors in assessing scientists in funding, appointment and promotion decisions. In addition to the many US signatories, HEFCE and Wellcome have signed. The themes of the recommendations are summarised as..../
Bruce Alberts, in a Science editorial, discusses the negative impact of metrics on innovation and risk taking in new areas of science: new areas of science are relatively sparsely populated with fewer papers consequently fewer citiations. He says "the leaders of the scientific enterprise must accept full responsibility for thoughtfully analyzing the scientific contributions of other researchers. To do so in a meaningful way requires the actual reading of a small selected set of each researcher's publications, a task that must not be passed by default to journal editors".