Science policy UK: Government Office for Science review
The UK Government Office for Science published its Review 2010-11
The UK Government Office for Science published its Review 2010-11
An interview with John Beddington on science advice, public engagement, risk and science policy. Final emphasis on climate change. Not sure that I agree with his view of media caution and chemical regulation in the environment: although it is true to say that there is a heavy emphasis on hazard derived from laboratory information, the problem with using risk effectively is that data to allow good calculation of environmental risk are difficult to obtain (although much better in the past couple of decades), particularly when thinking of the combined effects of different chemicals in the environment. The emphasis on hazard has come about not solely as a result of public attitudes - negative impacts of regulation by risk based on lab data in the past has been problematic.
John Holdren, Director of the US White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, has issued a memo on scientific integrity in government. This follows the earlier 2009 memo from the US President. /...
.../
Strong emphasis on the responsibility of the resposibility and accoutability of agencies for the integrity of science and scientific decsion-making. A different emphasis from the UK GOS principles of scientific advice and Guidelines for the use of science and engineering advice in Government released in June 2010.